[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1274365963.4046.39.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 16:32:43 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Netfilter Developer Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: netfilter: synproxy iptables target
Le jeudi 20 mai 2010 à 22:21 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit :
>
> pure synproxy can be used on firewall to protect the internal servers,
> which don't support neither syncookies and synproxy, from the attack
> of SYN-flood.
>
protecting servers using conntracking ?
Thats seems very dangerous to me.
> synproxy with defered connection relay acts as a layer 7 proxy, but
> works in kernel space totally, unlike tcp splice tech., which needs
> the applications in user space parse the requests, and establish the
> connections.
>
In the example given, only non persistent connections are handled...
These days, browsers and servers dont establish one socket per http
request...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists