lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 21:41:12 +0200 From: Krzysztof Olędzki <ole@....pl> To: eilong@...adcom.com CC: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: bnx2x + SFP+ DA/2.6.33.3: Got bad status 0x0 when reading from SFP+ EEPROM -> SFP+ module is not initialized On 2010-05-20 20:45, Eilon Greenstein wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:09 -0700, Krzysztof Olędzki wrote: >> On 2010-05-20 19:49, Eilon Greenstein wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 10:08 -0700, Krzysztof Olędzki wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I would like to connect a dual port SFP+ NetXtreme II BCM57711 >>>> 10-Gigabit NIC to a HP J9309A ProCurve 4-Port 10GbE SFP+ zl Module >>>> using a HP ProCurve 10-GbE SFP+ 7m Direct Attach Cable (J9285B). >>>> >>>> Unfortuantely, it does not work. :( After connecting the switch and >>>> the server together and loading the bnx2x module the switch logs: >>>> >>>> I 05/20/10 18:32:23 ports: port E4 is Blocked by STP >>>> I 05/20/10 18:32:23 ports: port E4 is now on-line >>>> >>>> Here is the dmesg output from the server: >>>> >>>> Broadcom NetXtreme II 5771x 10Gigabit Ethernet Driver bnx2x 1.52.1-5 (2009/11/09) >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 38 (level, low) -> IRQ 38 >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 >>>> bnx2x: part number 394D4342-31373735-31314131-473331 >>>> bnx2x: Loading bnx2x-e1h-5.2.7.0.fw >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.0: firmware: requesting bnx2x-e1h-5.2.7.0.fw >>>> eth4: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM57711 XGb (A0) PCI-E x8 5GHz (Gen2) found at mem dc000000, IRQ 38, node addr 00:10:18:5f:e4:b4 >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 45 (level, low) -> IRQ 45 >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.1: setting latency timer to 64 >>>> bnx2x: part number 394D4342-31373735-31314131-473331 >>>> bnx2x: Loading bnx2x-e1h-5.2.7.0.fw >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.1: firmware: requesting bnx2x-e1h-5.2.7.0.fw >>>> eth5: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM57711 XGb (A0) PCI-E x8 5GHz (Gen2) found at mem dd000000, IRQ 45, node addr 00:10:18:5f:e4:b6 >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.0: irq 97 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.0: irq 98 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.0: irq 99 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.0: irq 100 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.0: irq 101 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.0: irq 102 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> bnx2x: eth4: using MSI-X IRQs: sp 97 fp[0] 99 ... fp[3] 102 >>>> ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth4: link is not ready >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.1: irq 103 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.1: irq 104 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.1: irq 105 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.1: irq 106 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.1: irq 107 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> bnx2x 0000:04:00.1: irq 108 for MSI/MSI-X >>>> bnx2x: eth5: using MSI-X IRQs: sp 103 fp[0] 105 ... fp[3] 108 >>>> ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth5: link is not ready >>>> bnx2x: eth5 NIC Link is Down >>>> bnx2x: eth5 NIC Link is Down >>>> >>>> Loading the driver with debug mode enabled (modprobe bnx2x debug=0x20004) I got: >>> Thank you for this debug information! You saved one email round trip :) >> >> Hehe, thanks. >> >>> However, I still need some more information about the FW version and >>> nvram settings. Can you please send me the output of ethtool -i >> >> # ethtool -i eth5 >> driver: bnx2x >> version: 1.52.1-5 >> firmware-version: BC:5.0.13 PHY:0aa0:0406 >> bus-info: 0000:04:00.1 >> >>> and ethtool -e? Since ethtool -e is quite long, it is best to send >>> it as an attached file. >> >> Attached. > > Almost everything seems to be in order. Almost - since you don't get > link... I don't think I have tried using this kind of Direct Attach > Cable - so maybe it just needs some more time. Let's see if the > following makes any difference (other than delay the failure for another > 2.7 seconds): > > diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2x_link.c b/drivers/net/bnx2x_link.c > index ff70be8..bcee38c 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/bnx2x_link.c > +++ b/drivers/net/bnx2x_link.c > @@ -3113,7 +3113,7 @@ static u8 > bnx2x_wait_for_sfp_module_initialized(struct link_params *params) > u16 timeout; > /* Initialization time after hot-plug may take up to 300ms for > some > phys type ( e.g. JDSU ) */ > - for (timeout = 0; timeout< 60; timeout++) { > + for (timeout = 0; timeout< 600; timeout++) { > if (bnx2x_read_sfp_module_eeprom(params, 1, 1,&val) > == 0) { > DP(NETIF_MSG_LINK, "SFP+ module initialization " > > If it does help, be sure to let me know how much time it took (you > should have this debug print). Still no luck. :( The kernel printed many more "Got bad status 0x0 when reading from SFP+ EEPROM" messages. Finally I got: "SFP+ module is not initialized". Best regards, Krzysztof Olędzki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists