netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] can: SJA1000 add missing spin_lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100520.232155.150173423.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 20 May 2010 23:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	socketcan@...tkopp.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
	sam@...nborg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] can: SJA1000 add missing spin_lock_init()

From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 18:46:38 +0200

> As remarked by Sam Ravnborg the spin_lock variable, that has been introduced
> in commit 57c8a456640fa3ca777652f11f2db4179a3e66b6 ("can: Fix SJA1000 command
> register writes on SMP systems") has not been initialized properly.
> 
> This patch adds the initialization to allow spinlock debugging. 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>

Applied, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html