netdev - Re: bug fix patch lost: git problem or just incorrect merge?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100521.150717.157502983.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 21 May 2010 15:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	James.Bottomley@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bug fix patch lost: git problem or just incorrect merge?

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 09:45:49 -0700 (PDT)

> One of the reasons I ask people to let me merge is that it results in 
> cleaner history to not have criss-cross merges. And another is that I'm 
> pretty good at it, and letting me make merges also means that I am more 
> aware of problem spots.

That wasn't possible in this case.

This happened more than a week ago, as I needed to merge your tree into
net-2.6 to resolve a conflict there.  That's what took in the iscsi
bug fix, and this is way before the merge window.

Then I needed to pull net-2.6 into net-next-2.6 to resolve conflicts
existing between those two trees.

And this is why I ended up having to do the merge :-)

>> Either way, of course, we need the patch back ...
> 
> I'll fix it up.

Thanks Linus.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html