[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100524113300.2ef38e12@nehalam>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:33:00 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Emil S Tantilov <emils.tantilov@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] IPv6: only notify protocols if address is completely
gone
The notifier for address down should only be called if address is completely
gone, not just being marked as tentative on link transition. The code
in net-next would case bonding/sctp/s390 to see address disappear on link
down, but they would never see it reappear on link up.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
(cherry picked from commit 8595805aafc8b077e01804c9a3668e9aa3510e89)
---
Patch for 2.6.34-stable, not needed on earlier or later kernels
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 12e9558..844ffc5 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -2729,7 +2729,9 @@ static int addrconf_ifdown(struct net_device *dev, int how)
write_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
__ipv6_ifa_notify(RTM_DELADDR, ifa);
- atomic_notifier_call_chain(&inet6addr_chain, NETDEV_DOWN, ifa);
+ if (ifa->dead)
+ atomic_notifier_call_chain(&inet6addr_chain,
+ NETDEV_DOWN, ifa);
in6_ifa_put(ifa);
write_lock_bh(&idev->lock);
--
1.7.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists