[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1274780239.18023.48.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 02:37:19 -0700
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To: "Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
Cc: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: ixgbe: macvlan on PF/VF when SRIOV is enabled
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 10:54 -0700, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
> We look forward to it and will be happy to provide feedback.
I have submitted the patch to make macvlan on PF works when SRIOV is
enabled.
> One thing you can do is allocate VFs and then load the VF driver in
> your host domain and then assign each of them a macvlan filter. You'd
> get a similar effect.
That's I am trying to make it work for macvlan on VFs in host domain. I
need to add VF secondary addresses in address filter, right?
Do you have any aggregation performance comparison between multiple
macvlans on PF and single macvlan per VF in host domain? I will run some
test to figure it out. If you have some data to share that would be
great.
Thanks
Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists