netdev - Re: Namespaces and devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BFBA30E.4040304@free.fr>
Date:	Tue, 25 May 2010 12:14:38 +0200
From:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>
To:	Martín Ferrari <martin.ferrari@...il.com>
CC:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@...hia.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: Namespaces and devices

On 05/25/2010 11:56 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 16:04, Daniel Lezcano<daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>  wrote:
>
>    
>> The documentation on this website is a bit out dated. That was the initial
>> behavior but was changed as the following.
>>
>> All the virtual devices are destroyed with the network namespace. The
>> destroyable virtual devices are identified when they have the dellink ops
>> defined. If you can do the 'ip link del' command on this device, then this
>> device type will be destroyed by a netns.
>>      
> Fair enough, thanks for the explanation.
>    

You are welcome ;)

>> About the oops,  was the it "kernel panic when using
>> netns+bridges+tc(netem)" ?
>>      
> No, this is a different issue. Probably it got lost in the noise of
> the thread, but it is here:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.bugs.general/694830/focus=158583
> (it is my second mail in that thread)

Ok, I was able to reproduce it easily. If I have spare time this week, I 
will look at the oops.

>>> Also, I have read somewhere (now I cannot find it) that supposedly, I
>>> should be able to move real devices to a netns, but I always get
>>> Invalid argument errors.
>>>        
>> Yes, that was previously the case with the proof of concept, because sysfs
>> per namespace was enabled. But this feature is not merged upstream yet (but
>> is on the way), so physical devices are not movable across namespaces.
>>      
> OK. The plan is for them to return to netns 1 automatically at destroy?
>    

Yes, this is the plan.

Thanks
   -- Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html