[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C8228316.35508%scofeldm@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 07:49:42 -0700
From: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@...co.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ibm.com>,
Dirk Herrendoerfer <d.herrendoerfer@...ibm.com>,
Vivek Kashyap <vivk@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] IFLA_PORT_* iproute2 cmd line
On 5/26/10 5:38 AM, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 May 2010, Scott Feldman wrote:
>> I need to provide an iproute2 patch for IFLA_PORT_* and I wanted to hash out
>> the cmd line before I submit it. Here's what I think would work based on
>> previous input from Arnd:
>>
>> Usage: ip port associate DEVICE [ vf NUM ] {PROFILE|VSI}
>> ip port pre-associate DEVICE [ vf NUM ] VSI
>> ip port pre-associate-rr DEVICE [ vf NUM ] VSI
>> ip port dis-associate DEVICE [ vf NUM ]
>> ip port show [ DEVICE [ vf NUM ] ]
>>
>> PROFILE := port-profile PORT-PROFILE
>> [ instance-uuid INSTANCE-UUID ]
>> [ host-uuid HOST-UUID ]
>>
>> VSI := vsi managerid MGR typeid VTID typeidversion VER
>> [ instance-uuid INSTANCE-UUID ]
>>
>> Comments?
>
> The syntax of the PROFILE and VSI arguments seems ok, but I'm
> not sure where exactly to put them.
>
> When talking to the kernel, I think this should be part of
> link command, because that is the underlying protocol:
>
> ip link set DEVICE [vf NUM] {associate {PROFILE|VSI} |
> pre-associate-rr VSI |
> pre-associate VSI |
> disassociate }
> ip link show [ DEVICE [ vf NUM ] ]
>
> This will also let you combine the association with additional
> "vf mac" and "vf vlan" commands as needed.
How does this strike you?
Usage: ip link add link DEV [ name ] NAME
[ txqueuelen PACKETS ]
[ address LLADDR ]
[ broadcast LLADDR ]
[ mtu MTU ]
type TYPE [ ARGS ]
ip link delete DEV type TYPE [ ARGS ]
ip link set DEVICE [ { up | down } ]
[ arp { on | off } ]
[ dynamic { on | off } ]
[ multicast { on | off } ]
[ allmulticast { on | off } ]
[ promisc { on | off } ]
[ trailers { on | off } ]
[ txqueuelen PACKETS ]
[ name NEWNAME ]
[ address LLADDR ]
[ broadcast LLADDR ]
[ mtu MTU ]
[ netns PID ]
[ alias NAME ]
+ [ virtualport MODE {PROFILE|VSI} ]
[ vf NUM [ mac LLADDR ]
[ vlan VLANID [ qos VLAN-QOS ] ]
- [ rate TXRATE ] ]
+ [ rate TXRATE ]
+ [ virtualport MODE {PROFILE|VSI} ] ]
ip link show [ DEVICE ]
TYPE := { vlan | veth | vcan | dummy | ifb | macvlan | can }
+
+ MODE := { associate | preassociate | preassociaterr | disassociate }
+
+ PROFILE := port-profile PORT-PROFILE
+ [ instance-uuid INSTANCE-UUID ]
+ [ host-uuid HOST-UUID ]
+
+ VSI := vsi managerid MGR typeid VTID typeidversion VER
+ [ instance-uuid INSTANCE-UUID ]
> The more interesting question is how to do this when we
> talk to lldpad. One idea was to use the same protocol
> but to direct the message to a specific pid (that of lldpad).
> That would require adding an option like '-p PID' to ip
> that lets us change who we talk to.
Let me get the user-to-kernel part working to establish the cmd line and you
can follow up with alternative addressing schemes.
> Alternatively, we could also create a top-level command like
> the one you described, but just use it for the case when
> we're talking to lldpad, finding out the PID from the
> /var/run/lldpdad.pid internally. Right now, I'm leaning
> towards the more flexible option of being able to direct
> the command anywhere.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists