[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201005262041.01551.nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 20:41:01 +0300
From: Denys Fedorysychenko <nuclearcat@...learcat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, shemminger@...tta.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, ycheng@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: Socket option to set congestion window
On Wednesday 26 May 2010 20:33:46 Andi Kleen wrote:
> Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com> writes:
> > Thanks to NAT, the concept of a network path or even host specific
> > path is a weakened concept. On the Internet this may be a path
> > characteristic per client, which unfortunately has no visibility in
> > the kernel other than per connection state. When a single IP address
> > may have thousands of hosts behind it, caching TCP parameters for that
> > IP address is implicitly doing a huge aggregation-- probably dicey...
>
> Yes all of Saudi-Arabia used to be (is?) one IP address...
>
> Caching anything per IP is bogus.
>
> -Andi
>
In Lebanon i have around 30k users behind few IP addresses(around 6) (for
web).
Because backbone here $1200/Mbit, and satellites mostly(rtt 400+ ms)... so TCP
accelerators and caching proxy a must. Tproxy doesn't work well yet to use
full set of ip's.
And no local google/youtube servers, so maybe i'm affected by something? :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists