[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100526212745.GC24615@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 23:27:45 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: andi@...stfloor.org, therbert@...gle.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, ycheng@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: Socket option to set congestion window
> > Yes all of Saudi-Arabia used to be (is?) one IP address...
> >
> > Caching anything per IP is bogus.
>
> And letting the applications choose the CWND is better?!?!
No I actually agree with you on that. Just saying that
anything that relies on per IP caching is bad too.
As I understand the idea was that the application knows
what flows belong to a single peer and wants to have
a single cwnd for all of those. Perhaps there would
be a way to generalize that to tell it to the kernel.
e.g. have a "peer id" that is known by applications
and the kernel could manage cwnds shared between connections
associated with the same peer id?
Just an idea, I admit I haven't thought very deeply
about this. Feel free to poke holes into it.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists