| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <F2E9EB7348B8264F86B6AB8151CE2D790B7958E740@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:21:02 +0800 From: "Xin, Xiaohui" <xiaohui.xin@...el.com> To: "mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com> CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Subject: issue about virtio-net driver to suppoprt vhost mergeable buffer with zero-copy to support PS mode Michael, I'm now looking into the vhost mergeable buffer, and I tried to use it to support PS mode with zero-copy. And I found an issue there that I have to modify the guest virito-net driver. When guest virtio-net driver submits mergeable buffers, it submits multiple pages outside. In zero-copy case, vhost cannot know which page is used to put header, and which page is used to put payload. Then vhost can only reserves 12 bytes for each page. That means, the page_offset of the payload DMAed into the guest buffer is always 12 bytes. But guest virtio-net driver always use offset 0 to put the data (See receive_mergeable()). That's where the zero-copy use mergeable buffer must modify. Have I missed something here? And how do you think about it? Thanks Xiaohui -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists