[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100527212523.GB2345@sysclose.org>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 18:25:23 -0300
From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@...close.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: amwang@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mpm@...enic.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
gospo@...hat.com, nhorman@...driver.com, jmoyer@...hat.com,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, fubar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [v5 Patch 1/3] netpoll: add generic support for bridge and
bonding devices
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 01:35:59PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@...close.org>
> Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 15:05:45 -0300
>
> > I did the following patch to discard the packet if it was IN_NETPOLL
> > and the read_lock() fails, so I could go ahead testing it:
>
> This is disgusting, let's just disallow console output from such
> locations. Defer them to a workqueue if their output is so critical.
I did that patch just to see the backtrace in the serial console
and to keep testing it. It's not a solution at all.
Just to be clear, the second problem isn't related to that patch
and the console message is already in a workqueue.
--
Flavio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists