[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BFF7BE2.6020503@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 16:16:34 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Flavio Leitner <fbl@...close.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...hat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [v5 Patch 1/3] netpoll: add generic support for bridge and bonding
devices
On 05/28/10 02:05, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
> Hi guys!
>
> I finally could test this to see if an old problem reported on bugzilla[1] was
> fixed now, but unfortunately it is still there.
>
> The ticket is private I guess, but basically the problem happens when bonding
> driver tries to print something after it had taken the write_lock (monitor
> functions, enslave/de-enslave), so the printk() will pass through netpoll, then
> on bonding again which no matter what mode you use, it will try to read_lock()
> the lock again. The result is a deadlock and the entire system hangs.
>
Does the attached patch fix this hang?
Thanks!
----------------------->
We should notify netconsole that bond is changing its slaves
when we use active-backup mode.
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@...hat.com>
----
View attachment "drivers-net-bonding-fix-activebackup-deadlock.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (899 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists