[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTilr0YX2xQW80BZmRVyAk2jv-PlkXmJkaLGj3-7v@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 22:11:29 +0800
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] act_nat: fix the wrong checksum when addr isn't in
old_addr/mask
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> Yes the patch is correct.
>>
>> However, the fact that you need this patch means that your act_nat
>> setup isn't perfect. Ideally all the unNATed packets should be
>> filtered out before you hit act_nat.
>
> Thinking about this topologic:
>
> client -> DNAT -> router -> server.
>
> DNAT is used to map a public IP to server's private IP. If a
> DEST_UNREACH ICMP packet is sent out by router, in order to handle
> this ICMP packet correctly, I have to pass it to act_nat.c. How can I
> filter out the other packets? By inspecting the inner IP destination
> address of this ICMP packet? Maybe I can use u32 with complicate
> parameters.
>
Oh, I can pass all the ICMP packets, and the packets to the public IP
and the packets from the private IP.
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists