[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100530012401.GC9132@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 19:24:01 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mchan@...adcom.com, grundler@...isc-linux.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2: Fix IRQ failures during kdump.
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 04:05:27PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
> Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 09:22:07 -0700
>
> > I think there may be more issues after thinking about it some more.
> > The device is essentially still active at this time. The PCI
> > layer can turn off certain things, but enabling INTX can lead to
> > "irq x: nobody cared" if the driver is not ready for it. The
> > device really needs to be reset by the driver to be totally
> > reliable.
>
> We still have to find some generic way to do this.
>
> My position still stands, and it is entirely rediculious to
> have every single driver have to attend to all of these
> esoteric details just to handle interrupts properly. Drivers
> are hard enough to write as-is.
I think we can do this generically. PCI has disable bits for MSI,
MSI-X and pin-based interrupts. So we can leave MSIs enabled, but disable
interrupt generation.
We should probably set the interrupt type back to pin-based before the
kexec kernel starts, right? Or do we expect drivers to handle being
initialised with the device still set to MSI mode?
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists