[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C03DCF3.1080001@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 17:59:47 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@...ia.com>
CC: ext Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Timo Teras <timo.teras@....fi>
Subject: Re: [RFC] netfilter: WIP: Xtables idletimer target implementation
Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 10:05 +0200, ext Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Friday 2010-05-28 07:25, Luciano Coelho wrote:
>>> Do you have any other suggestion on how I can associate the rules to
>>> specific interfaces?
>> -A INPUT -i foo -j do
>> -A do -j idletimer
>>
>> A little funny, but actually this would allow me to keep a timer
>> for a group of interfaces rather than just per-if.
>
> Yes, this is what our userspace apps are doing. I've formulated my
> question in an unclear way. If you check the rest of the code, I create
> sysfs files under the interface's directory and use it as an attribute
> to notify the userspace when the timer has expired.
>
> In short, I need to figure out a way to associate each rule with an
> interface in sysfs, so I can notify the userspace when the timer has
> expired. I couldn't figure out another way to do it. Any suggestions?
How about just using an arbitrary user-supplied name? People can
name them after interfaces, or anything else.
>>>>> +static int xt_idletimer_checkentry(const struct xt_tgchk_param *par)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + const struct xt_idletimer_info *info = par->targinfo;
>>>>> + const struct ipt_entry *entryinfo = par->entryinfo;
>>>>> + const struct ipt_ip *ip = &entryinfo->ip;
>>>> I'm not sure spying on ipt_ip is a long-term viable solution.
>>> Do you have any other suggestions on how I could get an interface
>>> associated with the rule? I thought about having the userspace pass the
>>> interface as an option to the rule (like I already do for the timeout
>>> value), but that looked ugly to me, since the interface can already be
>>> defined as part of the ruleset.
>> I have patches ready since a while that decouple ipt_ip
>> from a rule, so there is no guarantee that such will exist.
>
> Okay, if that's the case, then I don't know how to associate the rule
> with a specific net object in the kobject tree. Maybe I have to figure
> out a different way to notify the userspace, unless I add the target
> option I mentioned above. :/
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists