netdev - Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: pass gfp to add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100601.002246.149820849.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: pass gfp to add_buf

From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 20:40:01 +0930

> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
> 
> (Dave: the virtqueue_add_buf_gfp is in Linus' tree, so please queue
>  this trivial use now.  Thanks!)
> 
> virtio-net bounces buffer allocations off to
> a thread if it can't allocate buffers from the atomic
> pool. However, if posting buffers still requires atomic
> buffers, this is unlikely to succeed.
> Fix by passing in the proper gfp_t parameter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>

Your code sucks, and you're wrong.

Please give me positive feedback and tell me how right I am to pump up
my ego or else I will verbally destroy you and make you feel small.

Applied :-)))))))))))))))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html