netdev - Re: Fore 200 firmware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Jun 2010 18:12:04 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
Cc:	chas3@...rs.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fore 200 firmware

On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 06:03:31PM +0100, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > >does not have to redo the detective work I am doing. Packaging it along 
> > >with linux-atm packages (atm-tools in Debian) does not seem correct, so 
> > >do we need to make a special firmware package out of it or just add to 
> > >some other firmware repo that is packaged already?
> > 
> > i dont care which happens really.  i would to think it is part of
> > atm-tools since the fore200e driver really isnt useful with the
> > atm tools.
> 
> OK, so we should push the distro maintainers of it to create a suggested 
> firmware package or just include the fore firmware unconditionally - 
> once it is in released linux-atm.
> 
> > >What's the licence of the firmware anyway - unknown likely?
> > 
> > it says the firmware is gpl.  look at fore200e_firmware_copyright
> > in one of the old kernel distros.
> 
> Well, there is no source to fulfill the GPL... but there also should be 
> no problem redistributing it.
[...]

The GPL says (approximately) that people are allowed to redistribute binaries
only if they also redistribute source.  If the source is not available to the
public then anyone redistributing it is relying on the assumption that the
copyright holder didn't really mean this condition and will not enforce it.
At any time the copyright holder could sue them for copyright infringement,
and they would have to rely on a defence such as laches.

This is a common problem with firmware images that were added to the kernel
long ago.  To reduce legal risk, Debian has been removing these images and
will not include them in any future releases, even in the non-free archive
section, unless this is fixed.  Please do not try to add this firmware to
Debian without getting an appropriate licence.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
                                                              - Albert Camus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html