[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1275505553.2797.2.camel@powerslave>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:05:53 +0300
From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@...ia.com>
To: ext Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kaber@...sh.net" <kaber@...sh.net>, Timo Teras <timo.teras@....fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netfilter: Xtables: idletimer target implementation
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 20:37 +0200, Coelho Luciano (Nokia-D/Helsinki)
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 17:16 +0200, ext Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Wednesday 2010-06-02 15:41, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> >
> > >+static int __init idletimer_tg_init(void)
> > >+{
> > >+ int ret;
> > >+
> > >+ idletimer_tg_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("idletimer",
> > >+ &THIS_MODULE->mkobj.kobj);
> >
> > Isn't this going to oops when you compile this module as =y?
>
> Damn, that's true. :(
>
> I'll investigate how to fix this.
Would it be too hacky to force it to be a module (ie. add "depends on m"
in Kconfig)?
Besides /sys/module/xt_IDLETIMER and /sys/class/net, which we have
already discarded, I can't find any other place that would make sense to
add the idletimer in the kernel object hierarchy...
--
Cheers,
Luca.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists