[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100602204345.GE2385@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 13:43:45 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: replace hooks in __netif_receive_skb
V5
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 05:15:22PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 02 juin 2010 à 08:07 -0700, Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 09:52:08 +0200
> > Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +
> > > + err = netdev_rx_handler_register(dev, macvlan_handle_frame);
> > > + if (err) {
> > > + rcu_assign_pointer(dev->macvlan_port, NULL);
> > > + kfree(port);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return err;
> > > }
> >
> > Rcu assign is not necessary here for because the hook didn't
> > get registered so there is no way for other CPU to see it.
> >
>
> Thats a valid point, but we should use it, and not care of this litle
> detail. Compiler generates same code anyway, since NULL value is tested
> by rcu_assign_pointer().
>
> If we dont use rcu_assign_pointer() ourself, Paul or Arnd will put it
> one day or another :)
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/1/290
Some year soon, I hope. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists