Message-ID: <4C06CE66.8070506@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:34:30 -0700
From:	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@...ial.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 1/3] vhost: replace vhost_workqueue with per-vhost
 kthread

On 6/2/2010 11:40 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Replace vhost_workqueue with per-vhost kthread.  Other than callback
> argument change from struct work_struct * to struct vhost_work *,
> there's no visible change to vhost_poll_*() interface.
>
> This conversion is to make each vhost use a dedicated kthread so that
> resource control via cgroup can be applied.
>
> Partially based on Sridhar Samudrala's patch.
>
> * Updated to use sub structure vhost_work instead of directly using
>    vhost_poll at Michael's suggestion.
>
> * Added flusher wake_up() optimization at Michael's suggestion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo<tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin<mst@...hat.com>
> Cc: Sridhar Samudrala<samudrala.sridhar@...il.com>
> ---
> Okay, just tested it.  dev->work_lock had to be updated to use irq
> operations but other than that it worked just fine.  Copied a large
> file using scp and it seems to perform pretty well although I don't
> have any reference of comparison.  So, here's the updated version with
> the sign off.
>    

I tested this with 4 VMs running netperf TCP stream tests from guest to 
host and i am seeing similar
level of scalability in throughput i saw with the multi-thread workqueue 
patch.
            11200Mb/s - default         (host cpu utilization: 40%)
            21600Mb/s - multi-thread (host cpu utilization: 86%)

Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>

Thanks
Sridhar
> Thanks.
>
>   drivers/vhost/net.c   |   56 ++++++++++---------------
>   drivers/vhost/vhost.c |  111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>   drivers/vhost/vhost.h |   38 +++++++++++------
>   3 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
>
> Index: work/drivers/vhost/net.c
> ===================================================================
> --- work.orig/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ work/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -294,54 +294,58 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *
>   	unuse_mm(net->dev.mm);
>   }
>
> -static void handle_tx_kick(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
>   {
> -	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> -	struct vhost_net *net;
> -	vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue, poll.work);
> -	net = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_net, dev);
> +	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue,
> +						  poll.work);
> +	struct vhost_net *net = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_net, dev);
> +
>   	handle_tx(net);
>   }
>
> -static void handle_rx_kick(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void handle_rx_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
>   {
> -	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> -	struct vhost_net *net;
> -	vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue, poll.work);
> -	net = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_net, dev);
> +	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue,
> +						  poll.work);
> +	struct vhost_net *net = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_net, dev);
> +
>   	handle_rx(net);
>   }
>
> -static void handle_tx_net(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void handle_tx_net(struct vhost_work *work)
>   {
> -	struct vhost_net *net;
> -	net = container_of(work, struct vhost_net, poll[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX].work);
> +	struct vhost_net *net = container_of(work, struct vhost_net,
> +					     poll[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX].work);
>   	handle_tx(net);
>   }
>
> -static void handle_rx_net(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void handle_rx_net(struct vhost_work *work)
>   {
> -	struct vhost_net *net;
> -	net = container_of(work, struct vhost_net, poll[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX].work);
> +	struct vhost_net *net = container_of(work, struct vhost_net,
> +					     poll[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX].work);
>   	handle_rx(net);
>   }
>
>   static int vhost_net_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
>   {
>   	struct vhost_net *n = kmalloc(sizeof *n, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	struct vhost_dev *dev;
>   	int r;
> +
>   	if (!n)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	dev =&n->dev;
>   	n->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX].handle_kick = handle_tx_kick;
>   	n->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX].handle_kick = handle_rx_kick;
> -	r = vhost_dev_init(&n->dev, n->vqs, VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX);
> +	r = vhost_dev_init(dev, n->vqs, VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX);
>   	if (r<  0) {
>   		kfree(n);
>   		return r;
>   	}
>
> -	vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX, handle_tx_net, POLLOUT);
> -	vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_RX, handle_rx_net, POLLIN);
> +	vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX, handle_tx_net, POLLOUT, dev);
> +	vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_RX, handle_rx_net, POLLIN, dev);
>   	n->tx_poll_state = VHOST_NET_POLL_DISABLED;
>
>   	f->private_data = n;
> @@ -644,25 +648,13 @@ static struct miscdevice vhost_net_misc
>
>   static int vhost_net_init(void)
>   {
> -	int r = vhost_init();
> -	if (r)
> -		goto err_init;
> -	r = misc_register(&vhost_net_misc);
> -	if (r)
> -		goto err_reg;
> -	return 0;
> -err_reg:
> -	vhost_cleanup();
> -err_init:
> -	return r;
> -
> +	return misc_register(&vhost_net_misc);
>   }
>   module_init(vhost_net_init);
>
>   static void vhost_net_exit(void)
>   {
>   	misc_deregister(&vhost_net_misc);
> -	vhost_cleanup();
>   }
>   module_exit(vhost_net_exit);
>
> Index: work/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> ===================================================================
> --- work.orig/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ work/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -17,12 +17,12 @@
>   #include<linux/mm.h>
>   #include<linux/miscdevice.h>
>   #include<linux/mutex.h>
> -#include<linux/workqueue.h>
>   #include<linux/rcupdate.h>
>   #include<linux/poll.h>
>   #include<linux/file.h>
>   #include<linux/highmem.h>
>   #include<linux/slab.h>
> +#include<linux/kthread.h>
>
>   #include<linux/net.h>
>   #include<linux/if_packet.h>
> @@ -37,8 +37,6 @@ enum {
>   	VHOST_MEMORY_F_LOG = 0x1,
>   };
>
> -static struct workqueue_struct *vhost_workqueue;
> -
>   static void vhost_poll_func(struct file *file, wait_queue_head_t *wqh,
>   			    poll_table *pt)
>   {
> @@ -52,23 +50,31 @@ static void vhost_poll_func(struct file
>   static int vhost_poll_wakeup(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
>   			     void *key)
>   {
> -	struct vhost_poll *poll;
> -	poll = container_of(wait, struct vhost_poll, wait);
> +	struct vhost_poll *poll = container_of(wait, struct vhost_poll, wait);
> +
>   	if (!((unsigned long)key&  poll->mask))
>   		return 0;
>
> -	queue_work(vhost_workqueue,&poll->work);
> +	vhost_poll_queue(poll);
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
>   /* Init poll structure */
> -void vhost_poll_init(struct vhost_poll *poll, work_func_t func,
> -		     unsigned long mask)
> +void vhost_poll_init(struct vhost_poll *poll, vhost_work_fn_t fn,
> +		     unsigned long mask, struct vhost_dev *dev)
>   {
> -	INIT_WORK(&poll->work, func);
> +	struct vhost_work *work =&poll->work;
> +
>   	init_waitqueue_func_entry(&poll->wait, vhost_poll_wakeup);
>   	init_poll_funcptr(&poll->table, vhost_poll_func);
>   	poll->mask = mask;
> +	poll->dev = dev;
> +
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&work->node);
> +	work->fn = fn;
> +	init_waitqueue_head(&work->done);
> +	atomic_set(&work->flushing, 0);
> +	work->queue_seq = work->done_seq = 0;
>   }
>
>   /* Start polling a file. We add ourselves to file's wait queue. The caller must
> @@ -92,12 +98,29 @@ void vhost_poll_stop(struct vhost_poll *
>    * locks that are also used by the callback. */
>   void vhost_poll_flush(struct vhost_poll *poll)
>   {
> -	flush_work(&poll->work);
> +	struct vhost_work *work =&poll->work;
> +	int seq = work->queue_seq;
> +
> +	atomic_inc(&work->flushing);
> +	smp_mb__after_atomic_inc();	/* mb flush-b0 paired with worker-b1 */
> +	wait_event(work->done, seq - work->done_seq<= 0);
> +	atomic_dec(&work->flushing);
> +	smp_mb__after_atomic_dec();	/* rmb flush-b1 paired with worker-b0 */
>   }
>
>   void vhost_poll_queue(struct vhost_poll *poll)
>   {
> -	queue_work(vhost_workqueue,&poll->work);
> +	struct vhost_dev *dev = poll->dev;
> +	struct vhost_work *work =&poll->work;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->work_lock, flags);
> +	if (list_empty(&work->node)) {
> +		list_add_tail(&work->node,&dev->work_list);
> +		work->queue_seq++;
> +		wake_up_process(dev->worker);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags);
>   }
>
>   static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> @@ -125,10 +148,52 @@ static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_
>   	vq->log_ctx = NULL;
>   }
>
> +static int vhost_worker(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct vhost_dev *dev = data;
> +	struct vhost_work *work;
> +
> +repeat:
> +	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);	/* mb paired w/ kthread_stop */
> +
> +	if (kthread_should_stop()) {
> +		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	work = NULL;
> +	spin_lock_irq(&dev->work_lock);
> +	if (!list_empty(&dev->work_list)) {
> +		work = list_first_entry(&dev->work_list,
> +					struct vhost_work, node);
> +		list_del_init(&work->node);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&dev->work_lock);
> +
> +	if (work) {
> +		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> +		work->fn(work);
> +		smp_wmb();	/* wmb worker-b0 paired with flush-b1 */
> +		work->done_seq = work->queue_seq;
> +		smp_mb();	/* mb worker-b1 paired with flush-b0 */
> +		if (atomic_read(&work->flushing))
> +			wake_up_all(&work->done);
> +	} else
> +		schedule();
> +
> +	goto repeat;
> +}
> +
>   long vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *dev,
>   		    struct vhost_virtqueue *vqs, int nvqs)
>   {
> +	struct task_struct *worker;
>   	int i;
> +
> +	worker = kthread_create(vhost_worker, dev, "vhost-%d", current->pid);
> +	if (IS_ERR(worker))
> +		return PTR_ERR(worker);
> +
>   	dev->vqs = vqs;
>   	dev->nvqs = nvqs;
>   	mutex_init(&dev->mutex);
> @@ -136,6 +201,9 @@ long vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *de
>   	dev->log_file = NULL;
>   	dev->memory = NULL;
>   	dev->mm = NULL;
> +	spin_lock_init(&dev->work_lock);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->work_list);
> +	dev->worker = worker;
>
>   	for (i = 0; i<  dev->nvqs; ++i) {
>   		dev->vqs[i].dev = dev;
> @@ -143,9 +211,10 @@ long vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *de
>   		vhost_vq_reset(dev, dev->vqs + i);
>   		if (dev->vqs[i].handle_kick)
>   			vhost_poll_init(&dev->vqs[i].poll,
> -					dev->vqs[i].handle_kick,
> -					POLLIN);
> +					dev->vqs[i].handle_kick, POLLIN, dev);
>   	}
> +
> +	wake_up_process(worker);	/* avoid contributing to loadavg */
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> @@ -217,6 +286,9 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev
>   	if (dev->mm)
>   		mmput(dev->mm);
>   	dev->mm = NULL;
> +
> +	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dev->work_list));
> +	kthread_stop(dev->worker);
>   }
>
>   static int log_access_ok(void __user *log_base, u64 addr, unsigned long sz)
> @@ -1113,16 +1185,3 @@ void vhost_disable_notify(struct vhost_v
>   		vq_err(vq, "Failed to enable notification at %p: %d\n",
>   		&vq->used->flags, r);
>   }
> -
> -int vhost_init(void)
> -{
> -	vhost_workqueue = create_singlethread_workqueue("vhost");
> -	if (!vhost_workqueue)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -void vhost_cleanup(void)
> -{
> -	destroy_workqueue(vhost_workqueue);
> -}
> Index: work/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> ===================================================================
> --- work.orig/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> +++ work/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> @@ -5,13 +5,13 @@
>   #include<linux/vhost.h>
>   #include<linux/mm.h>
>   #include<linux/mutex.h>
> -#include<linux/workqueue.h>
>   #include<linux/poll.h>
>   #include<linux/file.h>
>   #include<linux/skbuff.h>
>   #include<linux/uio.h>
>   #include<linux/virtio_config.h>
>   #include<linux/virtio_ring.h>
> +#include<asm/atomic.h>
>
>   struct vhost_device;
>
> @@ -20,19 +20,31 @@ enum {
>   	VHOST_NET_MAX_SG = MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2,
>   };
>
> +struct vhost_work;
> +typedef void (*vhost_work_fn_t)(struct vhost_work *work);
> +
> +struct vhost_work {
> +	struct list_head	  node;
> +	vhost_work_fn_t		  fn;
> +	wait_queue_head_t	  done;
> +	atomic_t		  flushing;
> +	int			  queue_seq;
> +	int			  done_seq;
> +};
> +
>   /* Poll a file (eventfd or socket) */
>   /* Note: there's nothing vhost specific about this structure. */
>   struct vhost_poll {
>   	poll_table                table;
>   	wait_queue_head_t        *wqh;
>   	wait_queue_t              wait;
> -	/* struct which will handle all actual work. */
> -	struct work_struct        work;
> +	struct vhost_work	  work;
>   	unsigned long		  mask;
> +	struct vhost_dev	 *dev;
>   };
>
> -void vhost_poll_init(struct vhost_poll *poll, work_func_t func,
> -		     unsigned long mask);
> +void vhost_poll_init(struct vhost_poll *poll, vhost_work_fn_t fn,
> +		     unsigned long mask, struct vhost_dev *dev);
>   void vhost_poll_start(struct vhost_poll *poll, struct file *file);
>   void vhost_poll_stop(struct vhost_poll *poll);
>   void vhost_poll_flush(struct vhost_poll *poll);
> @@ -63,7 +75,7 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue {
>   	struct vhost_poll poll;
>
>   	/* The routine to call when the Guest pings us, or timeout. */
> -	work_func_t handle_kick;
> +	vhost_work_fn_t handle_kick;
>
>   	/* Last available index we saw. */
>   	u16 last_avail_idx;
> @@ -86,11 +98,11 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue {
>   	struct iovec hdr[VHOST_NET_MAX_SG];
>   	size_t hdr_size;
>   	/* We use a kind of RCU to access private pointer.
> -	 * All readers access it from workqueue, which makes it possible to
> -	 * flush the workqueue instead of synchronize_rcu. Therefore readers do
> +	 * All readers access it from worker, which makes it possible to
> +	 * flush the vhost_work instead of synchronize_rcu. Therefore readers do
>   	 * not need to call rcu_read_lock/rcu_read_unlock: the beginning of
> -	 * work item execution acts instead of rcu_read_lock() and the end of
> -	 * work item execution acts instead of rcu_read_lock().
> +	 * vhost_work execution acts instead of rcu_read_lock() and the end of
> +	 * vhost_work execution acts instead of rcu_read_lock().
>   	 * Writers use virtqueue mutex. */
>   	void *private_data;
>   	/* Log write descriptors */
> @@ -110,6 +122,9 @@ struct vhost_dev {
>   	int nvqs;
>   	struct file *log_file;
>   	struct eventfd_ctx *log_ctx;
> +	spinlock_t work_lock;
> +	struct list_head work_list;
> +	struct task_struct *worker;
>   };
>
>   long vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *, struct vhost_virtqueue *vqs, int nvqs);
> @@ -136,9 +151,6 @@ bool vhost_enable_notify(struct vhost_vi
>   int vhost_log_write(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct vhost_log *log,
>   		    unsigned int log_num, u64 len);
>
> -int vhost_init(void);
> -void vhost_cleanup(void);
> -
>   #define vq_err(vq, fmt, ...) do {                                  \
>   		pr_debug(pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__);       \
>   		if ((vq)->error_ctx)                               \
>    


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists