[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTil0sLvcHRTcGTfYYlCYzDH07sl7xgk6EcjL99cl@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 21:14:55 +0800
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: hadi@...erus.ca, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cls_u32: use skb_copy_bits() to dereference data safely
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:45 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 08:25:38 -0400
>
>> --- a/net/sched/cls_u32.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/cls_u32.c
>> @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ next_knode:
>>
>> for (i = n->sel.nkeys; i>0; i--, key++) {
>>
>> + int toff = key->off+(off2&key->offmask)- 4;
>> + if (unlikely(toff > skb->len))
>> + /* bailout here - needs some thought */
>> if ((*(__be32*)(ptr+key->off+(off2&key->offmask))^key->v
>
> I don't think it's that simple.
>
> You can't dereference from the skb->data linear area if your offset is
> beyond "skb->len - skb->data_len" (aka. skb_headlen()) since that's
> where the paged or fragmented portion starts.
>
> We really need to use skb_copy_bits() if we want to allow
> any offset into the SKB, and because of all the ways
> packets can be transformed and constructed we absolutely
> have to.
>
Maybe skb_header_pointer() is lighter.
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists