[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100602.064316.218079399.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 06:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hadi@...erus.ca
Cc: xiaosuo@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cls_u32: use skb_copy_bits() to dereference data safely
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:36:37 -0400
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 21:14 +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
>
>
>> Maybe skb_header_pointer() is lighter.
>
> A little worse than skb_copy_bits(). In any case, this change is going
> to hurt.
Umm, Jamal what are you talking about?
Using skb_header_pointer(), if the offset is in range, there is no
change from today other than a comparison.
If it is not in range, we use skb_copy_bits(). It's only for the
case where we have to fetch the value from the fragmented part
of the SKB.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists