[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100602.065711.191161830.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 06:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] sfc changes for 2.6.36
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:52:26 +0100
> Did you apply patch 12 "sfc: Get port number from CS_PORT_NUM, not PCI
> function number" to net-2.6?
When you mix bug fixes and cleanups, I'm going to apply it all to
net-next-2.6 You didn't even specify an intended destination in your
subject lines, so you leave it entirely open for interpretation and
my choice.
So, if you want a bug fix added to net-2.6, tossing it into a series
which is not wholly appropriate for net-next-2.6 is not that way to
accomplish that.
The way to do it is:
1) Submit the bug fix, explicitly state "[PATCH net-2.6 xxx] "
in your subject line.
2) Prepare your net-next-2.6 changes on top of that, and do one
of two things:
a) Explicitly state in your patch series in the "[PATCH net-next-2.6 0/xxx] "
posting "this depends upon the bug fixes posted in the series
XXX posted earlier.
b) Wait for the bug fix to reach net-next-2.6 when I do a merge,
then post your series.
Otherwise you make life way to miserable and complicated for me,
the one who has to review and integrate all of your work.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists