lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 3 Jun 2010 06:28:20 +0530
From:	Sujith <>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <>
CC:	Marcel Holtmann <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] ath9k: Determine Firmware on probe

Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> I had done some something similar for ar9170 a while back [1] when
> adding AVM FRITZ support to ar9170 and then got complaints from Marcel
> on this approach since it requires synching the PCI device IDs in two
> places. I frankly don't care how we do this but we should try to at
> least stick to one way of doing this.
> [1]

I did look at using the device_id table (using USB_DEVICE_VER),
but our case is like this:

* for prodId, version 2.2 load foo_1_1.fw
* for prodId, version everything else, load foo.fw

This requires a bit of handling in the driver, hence this patch.

But thinking about it, will this work ?

USB_DEVICE_VER(vend, 0x7010, 2, 2); [set .driver_info to "foo_1_1.fw]
USB_DEVICE(vend, 0x7010);           [set .driver_info to "foo.fw"]

That is, will the second registration be the fallback case in case
bcdLo and bcdHi are _anything_ other than 2.2 ?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists