[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19462.65068.93701.741079@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 06:28:20 +0530
From: Sujith <Sujith.Manoharan@...eros.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>
CC: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
"linville@...driver.com" <linville@...driver.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] ath9k: Determine Firmware on probe
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> I had done some something similar for ar9170 a while back [1] when
> adding AVM FRITZ support to ar9170 and then got complaints from Marcel
> on this approach since it requires synching the PCI device IDs in two
> places. I frankly don't care how we do this but we should try to at
> least stick to one way of doing this.
>
> [1] http://osdir.com/ml/linux-wireless/2009-05/msg01219.html
I did look at using the device_id table (using USB_DEVICE_VER),
but our case is like this:
* for prodId, version 2.2 load foo_1_1.fw
* for prodId, version everything else, load foo.fw
This requires a bit of handling in the driver, hence this patch.
But thinking about it, will this work ?
USB_DEVICE_VER(vend, 0x7010, 2, 2); [set .driver_info to "foo_1_1.fw]
USB_DEVICE(vend, 0x7010); [set .driver_info to "foo.fw"]
That is, will the second registration be the fallback case in case
bcdLo and bcdHi are _anything_ other than 2.2 ?
Sujith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists