[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C085C9A.30506@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:53:30 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
sean.hefty@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Patch] infiniband: check local reserved ports
On 06/04/10 00:39, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Since Tetsuo's patch already got merged, now this is the missing part
> > for local port reservation.
> >
> > Cc: Roland Dreier<rdreier@...co.com>
> > Cc: Tetsuo Handa<penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
> > Signed-off-by: WANG Cong<amwang@...hat.com>
> >
> > ---
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> > index b930b81..7b89bab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> > @@ -1978,6 +1978,7 @@ static int cma_alloc_any_port(struct idr *ps, struct rdma_id_private *id_priv)
> > rover = net_random() % remaining + low;
> > retry:
> > if (last_used_port != rover&&
> > + !inet_is_reserved_local_port(rover)&&
> > !idr_find(ps, (unsigned short) rover)) {
> > int ret = cma_alloc_port(ps, id_priv, rover);
> > /*
>
> Should this inet_is_reserved_local_port() test apply to all the "port
> spaces" that this code is handling? I honestly am ignorant of the
> intended semantics of the new local_reserved_ports stuff, hence my question.
>
Yes, but I only found this case, is there any else?
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists