[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C09FF4B.4050601@iki.fi>
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 10:39:55 +0300
From: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@....fi>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>,
françois romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Re: still having r8169 woes with XID 18000000
On 06/04/2010 11:24 PM, Timo Teräs wrote:
> On 06/04/2010 08:31 PM, Timo Teräs wrote:
> r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.3LK-NAPI loaded
> r8169 0000:00:09.0: PCI->APIC IRQ transform: INT A -> IRQ 18
> r8169 0000:00:09.0: no PCI Express capability
> eth0: RTL8169sc/8110sc at 0xf835c000, 00:30:18:a6:2b:6c, XID 18000000 IRQ 18
> r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.3LK-NAPI loaded
> r8169 0000:00:0b.0: PCI->APIC IRQ transform: INT A -> IRQ 19
> r8169 0000:00:0b.0: no PCI Express capability
> eth1: RTL8169sc/8110sc at 0xf8360000, 00:30:18:a6:2b:6d, XID 18000000 IRQ 19
> r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.3LK-NAPI loaded
> r8169 0000:00:0c.0: PCI->APIC IRQ transform: INT A -> IRQ 16
> r8169 0000:00:0c.0: no PCI Express capability
> eth2: RTL8169sc/8110sc at 0xf8364000, 00:30:18:a6:2b:6e, XID 18000000 IRQ 16
> r8169: mdio_write(f8364000, 0x00000003, 0000000a1) required 2000 cycles
> r8169: mdio_write(f8364000, 0x00000000, 000001000) required 2000 cycles
> r8169: mdio_write(f8364000, 0x00000000, 00000a0ff) required 2000 cycles
> r8169: mdio_write(f8364000, 0x00000014, 00000fb54) required 2000 cycles
>
> And eth2 was not working. Reloading the module gave a lot of other
> mdio_write and mdio_read errors.
>
> It seems to be pretty random when the errors occur, but that's the
> reason why the NIC stops working: mdio_write() fails (one or more times)
> at some crucial point of the board specific phy config code resulting in
> bad state.
>
> Any ideas how to debug this further?
Ok, I compared Realtek's and the in-tree driver. The only essential
difference is that Realtek driver uses udelay(100) in mdio_write()'s
busy polling loop where as the in-tree uses udelay(25). And that seems
to be the magic difference! Using udelay(100) fixes this!
I'm guessing that the phy needs slight delay between consecutive
mdio_write's even if it has advertised that the write has been
completed. And yes, just adding a small delay in the end of mdio_write
does seem to work too.
Francois, you think the below patch is ok? Should I send it as properly
formatted commit?
diff --git a/drivers/net/r8169.c b/drivers/net/r8169.c
index 217e709..6db62bf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/r8169.c
+++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c
@@ -559,6 +559,7 @@ static void mdio_write(void __iomem *ioaddr,
break;
udelay(25);
}
+ udelay(25);
}
static int mdio_read(void __iomem *ioaddr, int reg_addr)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists