[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 07:57:25 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: John Linn <john.linn@...inx.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
michal.simek@...alogix.com, john.williams@...alogix.com,
Brian Hill <brian.hill@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: ll_temac: fix interrupt bug when interrupt 0
is used
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 11:29 -0600, John Linn wrote:
> The code is not checking the interrupt for DMA correctly so that an
> interrupt number of 0 will cause a false error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Hill <brian.hill@...inx.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Linn <john.linn@...inx.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ll_temac_main.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ll_temac_main.c b/drivers/net/ll_temac_main.c
> index fa7620e..0615737 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ll_temac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ll_temac_main.c
> @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ temac_of_probe(struct of_device *op, const struct of_device_id *match)
>
> lp->rx_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
> lp->tx_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 1);
> - if (!lp->rx_irq || !lp->tx_irq) {
> + if ((lp->rx_irq == NO_IRQ) || (lp->tx_irq == NO_IRQ)) {
> dev_err(&op->dev, "could not determine irqs\n");
> rc = -ENOMEM;
> goto nodev;
Hasn't NO_IRQ been deprecated ?
Linus made it clear a while back that interrupt 0 was not valid and
that's the way it should be.
We now have an interrupt remapping scheme on powerpc, so we ensure that
0 always mean no interrupt. Other archs might need some fixups. Which
are specifically needs this patch ?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists