lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 07 Jun 2010 11:30:53 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	ratheesh k <ratheesh.ksz@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: in_dev->refcnt and dev->refcnt

Le lundi 07 juin 2010 à 14:50 +0530, ratheesh k a écrit :
> Is there any relation between in_dev->refcnt and dev->refcnt ?  . My
> question is : if  put or get on one variable affects other ?
> 

No, there is no relation between them.

You can increase / decrease one refcount or the other, using separate
API.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ