[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C0CEE3E.50100@unibas.ch>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:03:58 +0200
From: Christophe Jelger <Christophe.Jelger@...bas.ch>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Virtual device and ARP table
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le lundi 07 juin 2010 à 12:21 +0200, Christophe Jelger a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am currently "resurrecting" a Linux module (called LUNAR) which I
>> co-developed in 2007 and I'm having a weird kernel crash. This code
>> basically used to work fine up to 2.6.18 which was the latest version
>> before we stopped our development. I quickly ported it to 2.6.{31,32}:
>> it compiles fine and loads fine, but it crashes/hangs the kernel when
>> it's really being used.
>>
>> The module is a virtual device used for MANET routing: with the current
>> version, it basically "captures" DNS requests sent to the virtual
>> interface --> this triggers the sending of a fake DNS reply (see below)
>> and the creation of an ARP table entry for the destination (the MANET
>> route is built at the same time). Packets can then be sent to the
>> destination.
>>
>> The problem I'm having is that the kernel quickly hangs after I create a
>> new ARP entry (actually only if it's being used). If the entry I create
>> is set to NUD_PERMANENT, then everything works fine! I use
>> __neigh_lookup_errno to lookup/create the entry and neigh_lookup to
>> set/update the MAC address. Note that the ARP entry is created without
>> problem, but typically even just doing a userspace "arp -a" command can
>> crash the kernel (it also hangs the userspace command!). Doing "arp -na"
>> usually does NOT crash the kernel!
>>
>> I guess the problem comes from a combination of ARP + DNS
>> lookups/replies. Note that my kernel module has its own internal fake
>> DNS server which captures lookups and sends replies directly back to the
>> stack. What is amazing: if the ARP entry I create is set to
>> NUD_PERMANENT, then I don't get any crash (however I cannot develop my
>> module with permanent ARP entries).
>>
>> I'm wondering if there were any major changes to the neighbor and arp
>> code (between 2.6.18 and 2.6.31) that are somehow causing this problem ?...
>>
>> Any hint is very welcome.
>>
>> thanks in advance,
>> Christophe
>>
>> PS: I can easily reproduce the problem, and was trying to debug with
>> qemu and gdb server but so fra no success to clearly identify the
>> problem. Last point: it seems the kernel does not really "crash" but
>> rather ends up in some unstable state and maybe in a loop.
>> --
>
> Hi Christophe
>
> You should ask these kind of questions on netdev instead of lkml.
>
> And of course, post your patch, or send us a crystal ball ;)
>
> Yes, many things changed between 2.6.18 and 2.6.34
>
Eric: thanks for the forward to the netdev list. Regarding the code, I
of course welcome any help but didn't want to pollute the list with
unsollicited code: I can of course of course send it directly to anyone
who is willing to help (I can easily reproduce the problem on different
machines).
Christophe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists