[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1275931108.2545.168.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:18:27 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-2.6] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: add a new lock
Le lundi 07 juin 2010 à 18:56 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> >
> > For your information, bug is already there before my patch.
> >
> > So this est_lock is a wrong protection, in the sense its so convoluted
> > that nobody but you and me even noticed it was buggy in the first place.
> >
> > (see commit 5d944c640b4 for a first patch)
> >
> >
>
> Here is v2 of the patch.
>
> Even if its a bug correction, I cooked it for net-next-2.6 since bug
> probably never occured, and patch is too large to be sent to
> net-2.6/linux-2.6 before testing.
>
> Another bug comes from net/netfilter/xt_RATEEST.c : It apparently
> calls gen_kill_estimator() / gen_new_estimator() without holding RTNL ?
>
> So we should add another lock to protect things (est_root, elist[], ...)
>
> David, I can send a net-2.6 patch for this one, since it should be small
> enough. If yes, I'll respin this patch of course ;)
[PATCH net-2.6] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: add a new lock
gen_kill_estimator() / gen_new_estimator() is not always called with
RTNL held.
net/netfilter/xt_RATEEST.c is one user of these API that do not hold
RTNL, so random corruptions can occur between "tc" and "iptables"
Add a new fine grained lock instead of trying to use RTNL in xt_RATEEST
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
---
net/core/gen_estimator.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/gen_estimator.c b/net/core/gen_estimator.c
index cf8e703..3d11203 100644
--- a/net/core/gen_estimator.c
+++ b/net/core/gen_estimator.c
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ static DEFINE_RWLOCK(est_lock);
/* Protects against soft lockup during large deletion */
static struct rb_root est_root = RB_ROOT;
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(est_tree_lock);
static void est_timer(unsigned long arg)
{
@@ -201,7 +202,6 @@ struct gen_estimator *gen_find_node(const struct gnet_stats_basic_packed *bstats
*
* Returns 0 on success or a negative error code.
*
- * NOTE: Called under rtnl_mutex
*/
int gen_new_estimator(struct gnet_stats_basic_packed *bstats,
struct gnet_stats_rate_est *rate_est,
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ int gen_new_estimator(struct gnet_stats_basic_packed *bstats,
if (est == NULL)
return -ENOBUFS;
+ spin_lock(&est_tree_lock);
idx = parm->interval + 2;
est->bstats = bstats;
est->rate_est = rate_est;
@@ -242,6 +243,7 @@ int gen_new_estimator(struct gnet_stats_basic_packed *bstats,
list_add_rcu(&est->list, &elist[idx].list);
gen_add_node(est);
+ spin_unlock(&est_tree_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -261,13 +263,13 @@ static void __gen_kill_estimator(struct rcu_head *head)
*
* Removes the rate estimator specified by &bstats and &rate_est.
*
- * NOTE: Called under rtnl_mutex
*/
void gen_kill_estimator(struct gnet_stats_basic_packed *bstats,
struct gnet_stats_rate_est *rate_est)
{
struct gen_estimator *e;
+ spin_lock(&est_tree_lock);
while ((e = gen_find_node(bstats, rate_est))) {
rb_erase(&e->node, &est_root);
@@ -278,6 +280,7 @@ void gen_kill_estimator(struct gnet_stats_basic_packed *bstats,
list_del_rcu(&e->list);
call_rcu(&e->e_rcu, __gen_kill_estimator);
}
+ spin_unlock(&est_tree_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(gen_kill_estimator);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists