[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100608083120.e92a7739.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:31:20 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: David VomLehn <dvomlehn@...co.com>
Cc: to@...mlehn-lnx2.corp.sa.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Infrastructure for out-of-band parameter passing
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:30:49 -0700 David VomLehn wrote:
> Infrastructure to support out of band/indirect passing of data to functions.
>
> It is useful at times to be able to pass data from one function to another
> nested many stack frames more deeply than the passing function. Doing so
> allows the interfaces in the intervening functions to be simpler, though
> this "hidden" information passing risks increased complexity. In cases
> where this is justified, this simple infrastructure provides the
> functionality.
>
> Out of band data passing is implemented by adding, for each instance,
> an element to the task_struct that serves as the pointer to the top
> of a OOB parameter stack. Data is made available by being pushed
> on the OOB parameter stack by a function, and accessed via the top
> element of the OOB parameter stack.
>
> Signed-off-by: David VomLehn (dvomlehn@...co.com)
> ---
> include/linux/oobparam.h | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/oobparam.h b/include/linux/oobparam.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6eaa04c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/oobparam.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
...
> +
> +/**
> + * oobparam_push - push an out of band parameter frame on the OOB param stack
> + * @head Pointer to the OOB parameter stack top, which must be in the
> + * task structure.
> + * @frame Pointer to the OOB parameter frame, generally embedded in
> + * another structure
Need a colon ':' after the parameter names for kernel-doc notation:
* @head:
* @frame:
See Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt for info or ask me if you have
problems or questions.
Thanks.
> + */
> +static inline void oobparam_push(struct oobparam *top, struct oobparam *frame)
> +{
> + frame->next = top;
> + /* We need to ensure that the pointer in the frame is set prior to
> + * the pointer to the top in case we handle an interrupt in between
> + * the two stores. */
> + wmb();
> + top->next = frame;
> +}
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists