netdev - Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1006091719010.30265@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date:	Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:20:37 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Netfilter Developer Mailing List 
	<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket


On Wednesday 2010-06-09 17:16, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Wednesday 2010-06-09 16:16, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>>>> You could use the NOTRACK target to bypass connection tracking.
>>>>>         
>>>> I tried the NOTRACK target, but the packet is still going
>>>> throught reassembly, because the RAW filter has lower priority
>>>> then the connection track defragmentation..
>>>
>>> Right.
>>
>> Blech. That reminds me of
>> http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=126581823826735&w=2
>
>We already fixed that.

I know, and I posted it for the understanding of the OP
as to why RAW is after DEFRAG.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html