netdev - Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:57:02 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Netfilter Developer Mailing List 
	<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket

On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 05:20:37PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday 2010-06-09 17:16, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> >Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 2010-06-09 16:16, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> >>>>> You could use the NOTRACK target to bypass connection tracking.
> >>>>>         
> >>>> I tried the NOTRACK target, but the packet is still going
> >>>> throught reassembly, because the RAW filter has lower priority
> >>>> then the connection track defragmentation..
> >>>
> >>> Right.
> >>
> >> Blech. That reminds me of
> >> http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=126581823826735&w=2
> >
> >We already fixed that.
> 
> I know, and I posted it for the understanding of the OP
> as to why RAW is after DEFRAG.

thanks, it's helpful
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html