[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1OMh59-0004NM-5D@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:42:03 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Qianfeng Zhang <frzhang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
WANG Cong <amwang@...hat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] netpoll: Fix RCU usage
netpoll: Fix RCU usage
The use of RCU in netpoll is incorrect in a number of places:
1) The initial setting is lacking a write barrier.
2) The synchronize_rcu is in the wrong place.
3) Read barriers are missing.
4) Some places are even missing rcu_read_lock.
5) npinfo is zeroed after freeing.
This patch fixes those issues. As most users are in BH context,
this also converts the RCU usage to the BH variant.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
---
include/linux/netpoll.h | 13 ++++++++-----
net/core/netpoll.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netpoll.h b/include/linux/netpoll.h
index e9e2312..95c9f7e 100644
--- a/include/linux/netpoll.h
+++ b/include/linux/netpoll.h
@@ -57,12 +57,15 @@ void netpoll_send_skb(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb);
#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL
static inline bool netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- struct netpoll_info *npinfo = skb->dev->npinfo;
+ struct netpoll_info *npinfo;
unsigned long flags;
bool ret = false;
+ rcu_read_lock_bh();
+ npinfo = rcu_dereference(skb->dev->npinfo);
+
if (!npinfo || (list_empty(&npinfo->rx_np) && !npinfo->rx_flags))
- return false;
+ goto out;
spin_lock_irqsave(&npinfo->rx_lock, flags);
/* check rx_flags again with the lock held */
@@ -70,12 +73,14 @@ static inline bool netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
ret = true;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&npinfo->rx_lock, flags);
+out:
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
return ret;
}
static inline int netpoll_rx_on(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- struct netpoll_info *npinfo = skb->dev->npinfo;
+ struct netpoll_info *npinfo = rcu_dereference(skb->dev->npinfo);
return npinfo && (!list_empty(&npinfo->rx_np) || npinfo->rx_flags);
}
@@ -91,7 +96,6 @@ static inline void *netpoll_poll_lock(struct napi_struct *napi)
{
struct net_device *dev = napi->dev;
- rcu_read_lock(); /* deal with race on ->npinfo */
if (dev && dev->npinfo) {
spin_lock(&napi->poll_lock);
napi->poll_owner = smp_processor_id();
@@ -108,7 +112,6 @@ static inline void netpoll_poll_unlock(void *have)
napi->poll_owner = -1;
spin_unlock(&napi->poll_lock);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
#else
diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index 748c930..4b7623d 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ void netpoll_send_skb(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb)
unsigned long tries;
struct net_device *dev = np->dev;
const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
+ /* It is up to the caller to keep npinfo alive. */
struct netpoll_info *npinfo = np->dev->npinfo;
if (!npinfo || !netif_running(dev) || !netif_device_present(dev)) {
@@ -841,10 +842,7 @@ int netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np)
refill_skbs();
/* last thing to do is link it to the net device structure */
- ndev->npinfo = npinfo;
-
- /* avoid racing with NAPI reading npinfo */
- synchronize_rcu();
+ rcu_assign_pointer(ndev->npinfo, npinfo);
return 0;
@@ -888,6 +886,16 @@ void netpoll_cleanup(struct netpoll *np)
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&npinfo->refcnt)) {
const struct net_device_ops *ops;
+
+ ops = np->dev->netdev_ops;
+ if (ops->ndo_netpoll_cleanup)
+ ops->ndo_netpoll_cleanup(np->dev);
+
+ rcu_assign_pointer(np->dev->npinfo, NULL);
+
+ /* avoid racing with NAPI reading npinfo */
+ synchronize_rcu_bh();
+
skb_queue_purge(&npinfo->arp_tx);
skb_queue_purge(&npinfo->txq);
cancel_rearming_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work);
@@ -895,10 +903,6 @@ void netpoll_cleanup(struct netpoll *np)
/* clean after last, unfinished work */
__skb_queue_purge(&npinfo->txq);
kfree(npinfo);
- ops = np->dev->netdev_ops;
- if (ops->ndo_netpoll_cleanup)
- ops->ndo_netpoll_cleanup(np->dev);
- np->dev->npinfo = NULL;
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists