[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100610145915.721a86b7@nehalam>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:59:15 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Qianfeng Zhang <frzhang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
WANG Cong <amwang@...hat.com>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Subject: Re: [0/8] netpoll/bridge fixes
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:56:43 +1000
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 07:49:12AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for looking at this, and yes the original code does
> > look buggy. Not sure if I like the use of in_irq() to handle the netpoll
> > packets as special case. Is in_irq() really reliable for this?
>
> Yes because netpoll always calls ndo_start_xmit with IRQs disabled,
> while on the normal TX path IRQs must be enabled (as otherwise
> enabling BH would warn).
Okay, then add a comment where in_irq is used?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists