netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] ip: ip_ra

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100610.224855.212696344.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] ip: ip_ra_control() rcu fix

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 04:21:07 +0200

> [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] ip: ip_ra_control() rcu fix
> 
> commit 66018506e15b (ip: Router Alert RCU conversion) introduced RCU
> lookups to ip_call_ra_chain(). It missed proper deinit phase :
> When ip_ra_control() deletes an ip_ra_chain, it should make sure
> ip_call_ra_chain() users can not start to use socket during the rcu
> grace period. It should also delay the sock_put() after the grace
> period, or we risk a premature socket freeing and corruptions, as
> raw sockets are not rcu protected yet.
> 
> This delay avoids using expensive atomic_inc_not_zero() in
> ip_call_ra_chain().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>

Applied, thanks Eric.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html