[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100611122023.GA1598@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:20:23 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
To: Manfred Rudigier <Manfred.Rudigier@...cron.at>
Cc: 'David Miller' <davem@...emloft.net>,
Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@...cron.at>,
"'netdev@...r.kernel.org'" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"'linuxppc-dev@...abs.org'" <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gianfar: Fix setup of RX time stamping
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 01:49:05PM +0200, Manfred Rudigier wrote:
> Previously the RCTRL_TS_ENABLE bit was set unconditionally. However, if
> the RCTRL_TS_ENABLE is set without TMR_CTRL[TE], the driver does not work
> properly on some boards (Anton had problems with the MPC8313ERDB and
> MPC8568EMDS).
>
> With this patch the bit will only be set if requested from user space
> with the SIOCSHWTSTAMP ioctl command, meaning that time stamping is
> disabled during normal operation. Users who are not interested in time
> stamps will not experience problems with buggy CPU revisions or
> performance drops any more.
>
> The setting of TMR_CTRL[TE] is still up to the user. This is considered
> safe because users wanting HW timestamps must initialize the eTSEC clock
> first anyway, e.g. with the recently submitted PTP clock driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manfred Rudigier <manfred.rudigier@...cron.at>
> ---
Looks OK. I tested that it doesn't break anything, but I didn't
test the timestamping functionality. So
Reviewed-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists