netdev - Re: [PATCH] fragment: add fast path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:15:17 +0900
From:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	xiaosuo@...il.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, pekkas@...core.fi,
	jmorris@...ei.org, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fragment: add fast path

David Miller wrote:
>> As the fragments are usually in order,
> 
> In what universe does this happen "usually"?
> 
> Linux has been outputting fragments in reverse order for more than 10
> years.
> 
> I'm not applying this patch.

Dave,  I know we've been sending in reverse order, of course.
And, as far as I know, it seems Linux is the only implementation
which sends fragments in reverse order.

This is receiving side.  I think we should accept the fact
that Linux is not the only implementation, no?

--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html