netdev - Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1276534945.2074.11.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:02:25 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Pedro Garcia <pedro.netdev@...devamos.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag"
 (802.1p packet)

On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 18:49 +0200, Pedro Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:56:30 +0100, Ben Hutchings
> <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> > I have no particular opinion on this change, but you need to read and
> > follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
> > 
> > Ben.
> 
> Sorry, first kernel patch, and I did not know about it. I resubmit with
> the correct style / format:
[...]

Sorry, no you haven't.

- Networking changes go through David Miller's net-next-2.6 tree so you
need to use that as the baseline, not 2.6.26
- Patches should be applicable with -p1, not -p0 (so if you use diff,
you should run it from one directory level up)
- The patch was word-wrapped

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html