netdev - Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1276679284.2632.22.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:08:04 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Pedro Garcia <pedro.netdev@...devamos.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag"
 (802.1p packet)

Le mercredi 16 juin 2010 à 10:49 +0200, Pedro Garcia a écrit :
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:12:52 +0200, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>

> > Good luck for your first patch !
> 
> Here it is again. I added the modifications in http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2010/5/23/6277868 for HW accelerated incoming packets (it did not apply cleanly on the last version of
> the kernel, so I applied manually). Now, if the VLAN 0 is not explicitly created by the user, VLAN 0 packets will be treated as no VLAN (802.1p packets), instead of dropping them.
> 
> The patch is now for two files: vlan_core (accel) and vlan_dev (non accel)
> 
> I can not test on HW accelerated devices, so if someone can check it I will appreciate (even though in the thread above it looked like yes). For non accel I tessted in 2.6.26. Now the patch is for
> net-next-2.6, and it compiles OK, but I a have to setup a test environment to check it is still OK (should, but better to test).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pedro Garcia <pedro.netdev@...devamos.com>

OK, the patch itself is correct.

Now, could you please send it again with a proper changelog ?

In this changelog, please explain why patch is needed, and
keep lines short (< 72 chars), like the one you did in your first mail.

I'll then add my Signed-off-by, since I wrote the accelerated part ;)

Note : I wonder if another patch is needed, in case 8021q module is
_not_ loaded. We probably should accept vlan 0 frames in this case ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html