[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C27F8246C663564A84BB7AB3439772421B79CBCA1D@IRVEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:10:57 -0700
From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
To: "'Paul Mundt'" <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
cc: "'Mike Frysinger'" <vapier@...too.org>,
"James Bottomley" <JBottomley@...ell.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"FUJITA Tomonori" <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: bnx2 fails to compile on parisc because of missing
get_dma_ops()
Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:53:57PM -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
> > If sync_single is not defined, that means the CPU has a consistent
> > view of next_rx_buf and so it makes sense to prefetch it.
> >
> Except that's not a valid assertion, there are platforms that
> implement
> it for sanity checks yet still have consistent DMA. You are making
> inherently non-portable assumptions for a PCI driver, which is a good
> example of why drivers should never be side-stepping the API
> in the first
> place. If you want to have a micro-optimization for the consistent DMA
> case, you can check dma_is_consistent(), which is part of the API and
> will be variable on certain platform configurations (ie, some may be
> consistent with PCI but not on other busses, etc.)
>
>
Thanks for the tip. I didn't know about the dma_is_consistent() API.
I'll use this to fix it then.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists