[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100617210358A.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:13:42 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: JBottomley@...ell.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp,
mchan@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: bnx2 fails to compile on parisc because of missing
get_dma_ops()
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:13:49 -0500
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...ell.com> wrote:
> I'm not quite sure whose fault this one is.
>
> However, this code in bnx2.c:
>
> if (!get_dma_ops(&pdev->dev)->sync_single_for_cpu) {
> next_rx_buf =
> &rxr->rx_buf_ring[
> RX_RING_IDX(NEXT_RX_BD(sw_cons))];
> prefetch(next_rx_buf->desc);
> }
>
> Looks remarkably fragile: what exactly is it trying to do?
>
> The commit that causes the problem:
>
> commit a33fa66bcf365ffe5b79d1ae1d3582cc261ae56e
> Author: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>
> Date: Thu May 6 08:58:13 2010 +0000
>
> bnx2: Add prefetches to rx path.
>
> Looks fairly innocuous by the description.
>
> Should parisc have a get_dma_ops()? We don't need one because our dma
> ops are per platform not per bus.
Shouldn't. Only the architectures that use
include/dma-generic/dma-mapping.common.h need to have get_dma_ops().
Using include/dma-generic/dma-mapping.common.h for parisc is not a bad
idea though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists