[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100620215743.GA4036@nuttenaction>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:57:44 +0200
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: optimize Berkeley Packet Filter (BPF) processing
* David Miller | 2010-06-20 15:09:28 [-0700]:
>I think from this perspective, the change is fine too, nothing visible
>to the user is being changed here.
Fine! I have a fundamental question: can we start to use a C language
extension, known as "Labels as Values" in the kernel? I checked this and at
least gcc, llvm and icc support this extension (btw: c1x[1] don't mention
this):
static int sk_run_filter(struct sock_filter *filter) {
static const void *codetable[] =
{ &&BPF_S_RET_K, &&BPF_S_ALU_ADD_X, &&BPF_S_ALU_SUB_X, &&BPF_S_ALU_MUL_X };
int pc = 0;
goto *codetable[*(filter[pc++].code)];
BPF_S_RET_K:
return k;
BPF_S_ALU_ADD_X:
A += X;
goto *codetable[*(filter[pc++].code)];
BPF_S_ALU_SUB_X:
A -= X;
goto *codetable[*(filter[pc++].code)];
BPF_S_ALU_MUL_X:
A *= X
goto *codetable[*(filter[pc++].code)];
}
At least for gcc and llvm the results are quite impressive: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3120
arch/m68k/amiga/config.c:amiga_reset() seems to be the only user in the kernel
who use this extension (and nobody complains? ;-)
Cheers, Hagen
[1] http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1425.pdf
--
Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net> || http://blog.jauu.net/
Telephone: +49 174 5455209 || Key Id: 0x98350C22
Key Fingerprint: 490F 557B 6C48 6D7E 5706 2EA2 4A22 8D45 9835 0C22
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists