[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201006211953.44724.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:53:43 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>, Shirley Ma <xma@...ibm.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-2.6.35] virtio_net: fix oom handling on tx
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:03:16 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:13:49PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > - return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>
> If we do so, let's increment the dropped counter and/or error counter?
Yep, here's the extra change:
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -571,14 +571,16 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_
/* This can happen with OOM and indirect buffers. */
if (unlikely(capacity < 0)) {
if (net_ratelimit()) {
- if (likely(capacity == -ENOMEM))
+ if (likely(capacity == -ENOMEM)) {
dev_warn(&dev->dev,
"TX queue failure: out of memory\n");
- else
+ } else {
+ dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
dev_warn(&dev->dev,
"Unexpected TX queue failure: %d\n",
capacity);
}
+ dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
kfree_skb(skb);
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists