[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C1ECD04.20609@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:23:00 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...hat.com, herbert.xu@...hat.com,
bhutchings@...arflare.com, Ramkrishna.Vepa@...r.com,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [v3 Patch 2/2] mlx4: add dynamic LRO disable support
On 06/18/10 19:09, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 06:55:38AM -0400, Amerigo Wang wrote:
>> +static int mlx4_ethtool_op_set_flags(struct net_device *dev, u32 data)
>> +{
>> + struct mlx4_en_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + struct mlx4_en_dev *mdev = priv->mdev;
>> + int rc = 0;
>> + int changed = 0;
>> +
>> + if (data& (ETH_FLAG_NTUPLE | ETH_FLAG_RXHASH))
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> + if (data& ETH_FLAG_LRO) {
>> + if (!(dev->features& NETIF_F_LRO))
>> + changed = 1;
>> + } else if (dev->features& NETIF_F_LRO) {
>> + changed = 1;
>> + mdev->profile.num_lro = 0;
>
> Everything fine except that, what for you zero num_lro value?
>
> If we set it to zero it will stay zero and we will not create
> proper number of lro descriptors in mlx4_en_create_rx_ring()
> (called from mlx4_en_set_ringparam() -> mlx4_en_alloc_resources())
> when someone enable LRO again on.
>
Huh? Isn't ->num_lro which controls LRO of mlx4 driver?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists