[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100621173011.GH2354@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:30:11 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net tree
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:16:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> net/bridge/br_fdb.c net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_redirect.c
> net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_ulog.c net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
> net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c between commit
> f350a0a87374418635689471606454abc7beaa3a ("bridge: use rx_handler_data
> pointer to store net_bridge_port pointer") from the net tree and commit
> 81bdf5bd7349bd4523538cbd7878f334bc2bfe14 ("net: Make accesses to
> ->br_port safe for sparse RCU") from the tip tree.
>
> The net tree commit looks like a superset of the tip tree commit, so I
> effectively reverted the tip tree commit.
I defer to Jiri on this one, and will withdraw my patch.
Thanx, Paul
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
> http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists