[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C1FAAB3.8000403@garzik.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:08:51 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] sfc: Implement ethtool register dump operation
On 06/21/2010 01:52 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 13:39 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> On 06/21/2010 09:06 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings<bhutchings@...arflare.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/sfc/ethtool.c | 16 +++
>>> drivers/net/sfc/io.h | 7 +
>>> drivers/net/sfc/nic.c | 266 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/net/sfc/nic.h | 3 +
>>> 4 files changed, 292 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/ethtool.c b/drivers/net/sfc/ethtool.c
>>> index 22026bf..81b7f39 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/sfc/ethtool.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/ethtool.c
>>> @@ -242,6 +242,20 @@ static void efx_ethtool_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *net_dev,
>>> strlcpy(info->bus_info, pci_name(efx->pci_dev), sizeof(info->bus_info));
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int efx_ethtool_get_regs_len(struct net_device *net_dev)
>>> +{
>>> + return efx_nic_get_regs_len(netdev_priv(net_dev));
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void efx_ethtool_get_regs(struct net_device *net_dev,
>>> + struct ethtool_regs *regs, void *buf)
>>> +{
>>> + struct efx_nic *efx = netdev_priv(net_dev);
>>> +
>>> + regs->version = efx->type->revision;
>>> + efx_nic_get_regs(efx, buf);
>>
>> regs->version is really the version of hardware register dump exported
>> to userspace. You might want to hardcode this in the driver, to be
>> changed when efx_nic_regs[] array changes, rather than tying
>> regs->version directly to the SFC hardware architecture revision.
>>
>> However, if that limitation is OK with you, ie. ethtool register dump
>> code will change when h/w arch rev changes, then
>
> This is exactly what we want, as the set of defined registers (and
> fields within each register) will change in each architecture revision.
> (It may not change in each chip revision, but efx_nic_type::revision is
> supposed to reflect the architecture revision.)
>
> Although this code doesn't include an explicit format version, we can
> consider the current format to be version 0 and increment it if we ever
> want to make changes to the format for existing NIC revisions.
Yep -- that's the intented purpose. If you ever want to dump additional
registers or information, it might be useful to avoid a hard coupling
with the hardware arch revision.
Either way is fine, of course.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists