netdev - Re: 2.6.34 + IPv6: Oops?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100621200413.GA2280@EIS>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:04:13 +0200
From:	Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@...amorpher.de>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc:	Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.34 + IPv6: Oops?

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:25:08AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> It is not handling the case of ifp == NULL.
> 
> Maybe the following (move the assignment into the if block).
> 
> --- a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c	2010-06-21 10:22:20.825637690 -0700
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c	2010-06-21 10:24:31.573011996 -0700
> @@ -586,6 +586,7 @@ static void ndisc_send_na(struct net_dev
>  		src_addr = solicited_addr;
>  		if (ifp->flags & IFA_F_OPTIMISTIC)
>  			override = 0;
> +		inc_opt |= ifp->idev->cnf.force_tllao;
>  		in6_ifa_put(ifp);
>  	} else {
>  		if (ipv6_dev_get_saddr(dev_net(dev), dev, daddr,
> @@ -599,7 +600,6 @@ static void ndisc_send_na(struct net_dev
>  	icmp6h.icmp6_solicited = solicited;
>  	icmp6h.icmp6_override = override;
>  
> -	inc_opt |= ifp->idev->cnf.force_tllao;
>  	__ndisc_send(dev, neigh, daddr, src_addr,
>  		     &icmp6h, solicited_addr,
>  		     inc_opt ? ND_OPT_TARGET_LL_ADDR : 0);
> 
> 
> 

Thanks a lot! This fix seems to work fine for me (tested locally only).
I'll see what happens when I apply it to my server tomorrow.

Curious though as to why I wasn't able to reproduce it when compiling 
the kernel with Gentoo's GCC. It doesn't look like it should make any 
difference. Maybe I made a mistake when I tested it with Gentoo.

Regards
Andreas Klauer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html