lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100622.102455.232729115.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	npiggin@...e.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] net: Introduce u64_stats_sync
 infrastructure

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:29:54 +0200

> diff --git a/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h b/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h
> index e69de29..5a4f318 100644
> --- a/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h
> +++ b/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
> +#ifndef _LINUX_U64_STATS_SYNC_H
> +#define _LINUX_U64_STATS_SYNC_H
> +

That's a really weird patch hunk for a newly added file.

The hunk header is saying that the new file start 1 line
in.  Which doesn't make any sense, and GIT reject this
saying that you're trying to make a modification to a
file which doesn't exist.

I applied this by hand, but I really wonder how you managed
to create such a patch :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ